Download for Google Chrome (opens in a new tab)
Download for Edge (opens in a new tab)
Download for Firefox (opens in a new tab)A federal magistrate judge ordered Hyatt Corporation to produce internal documents concerning accessibility barriers on California-related webpages from 2022 to 2024.
A California federal court has conditionally granted a motion to substitute the lead plaintiff in a putative class action accusing Victoria's Secret & Co. of digital accessibility barriers, subject to specific factual amendments.
The US Department of Education has published a notice inviting grant applications for FY 2025 to fund a National Center to Improve Faculty Capacity to Use Educational Technology.
The US Department of Education has published a notice inviting applications for fiscal year 2025 grants under the Stepping-Up Technology Implementation program, opening June 25, 2025.
A federal court denied Alameda County’s post-trial motions, upholding a $30,500 damages verdict and issuing an injunction that requires the Clerk-Recorder’s Office to offer transcriber services to blind patrons.
A federal court in California ordered Alameda County to provide human transcriber services to blind and visually impaired individuals completing official forms, while denying requests for website remediation and staff training mandates.
A federal judge in California denied preliminary approval of a class action settlement with Fashion Nova over website accessibility, citing an unjustified reversion clause that would return unclaimed funds to the retailer.
A federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled that an existing consent decree with another party does not bar a blind customer from pursuing an independent ADA website accessibility lawsuit against Wayfair.
A federal court in California has denied Victoria's Secret's motion to dismiss an accessibility lawsuit alleging that screen reader barriers prevented a blind customer from selecting a retail store for in-store pickup.
A federal judge ruled that Missouri's Department of Social Services violated the SNAP Act, Due Process, and the ADA by maintaining an inaccessible call center and failing to provide reasonable accommodations to applicants with disabilities.
A federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an ADA suit against Rolex SA due to the lack of a nexus between the website and a physical store, while finding personal jurisdiction proper.